The End of the Page

Welcome to Pandora’s Tea Party!

Poster Board = $2.00, Two Sharpie Markers = $3, boiling down complex issues into a fictional comparison of choice = priceless.

There are two mostly unavoidable facts going into the first midterm elections for President Obama. One, the first midterm election after a new president takes power almost always sees a loss in the seats for his (or someday, her) party. This is commonly referred to as “buyer’s remorse” where the enthusiasm for the president’s party wanes after the win and they sit back on their laurels, while the losing party rallies harder and louder to try and come back from the embarrassing loss of the big seat. Two, in terms of this specific moment of economic hardship, the party in power is held to blame and again they lose more seats. It doesn’t matter where the problem started and how far back the blame can be placed. Most voters will only turn their calendars back so far before deciding that the current governing body had enough time to fix whatever ails the country. True, that sounds a bit illogical, but politics and logic are very, very long distance friends.

So as the Republican party looks to gain seats across the board during this so-called anti-incumbent rage, they are now seeing a quite different landscape over the horizon. There are still blue states where they were before, but now the red states are getting…redder. The fervor they helped whip up has bitten them much deeper and much sharper than the Democrats. Now heading into Nov. 2 the right wing of this nation has to figure out what they can do with a handful of wildly conservative, if not radically so, candidates which have to be groomed for the national stage. They opened a political Pandora’s Box and what rushed out has pushed any moderation in the Republican party completely out of the picture. Here’s just a snippet of what they are working with:

Sharron Angle (R-NV):

• she is an extreme pro-lifer, extending her anti-abortion stance even into cases of rape and incest. When asked her reasoning for those viewpoints she said “two wrongs don’t make a right” and when directly asked what she would tell a 13-year-old girl who was raped by her own father, Angle likened it to turning a “lemon situation into lemonade”
• she has repeatedly referred to unnamed members of Congress as “domestic enemies”
• after numerous attempts to help her back away from this statements, she has stood her ground on stating that if things don’t go the right way in November, the citizens have a right to fall back on their “second amendment remedies”. Yes, she means guns.

Christine O’Donnell (R-DE):

• in 1998 she made an appearance on Politically Incorrect with Bill Maher and espoused how truth is always the best route to take in any situation. While this is a morally upstanding belief, she was pressed on it and further clarified by saying she would not even lie to Nazis if she had Jews hiding in her house because “You never have to practice deception. God always provides a way out.”
• she founded a group called SALT (Savior’s Alliance for Lifting the Truth) which lobbies the government on the basis of tightly followed Christian morals. At one point in a MTV interview she was quoted saying, “It is not enough to be abstinent with other people, you also have to be be abstinent alone. The Bible says that lust in your heart is committing adultery, so you can’t masturbate without lust.”
• In a continued defense of bringing religion into every facet of society, she once said, “We took the Bible and prayer out of public schools. Now we’re having weekly shootings. We had the 60s sexual revolution, and now people are dying of AIDS.”
• In fact, since I can’t list all of the amazingly dangerous and inane stances she holds, here’s a link to an incredibly thorough list put together by Think Progress.

Joe Miller (R-AK):

• joins Angle in believing that abortion should be outlawed completely, even in cases of rape or incest (no word yet on his feeling about lemonade.)
• believes Medicare and Social Security should be phased out completely (no word yet on how he plans to help seniors pay for those benefits on their own.)

Those are only a few of the hard right wing extremists to swing out of the hurricane of anger and disappointment over the current state of affairs in this country. I’m not saying that the anger isn’t justified. The country is in rough shape, but this incoming flock of proposed candidates is talking about legislating by religion over democracy. They view the Constitution not as a document written by men, but one deemed to be written by God (the bitter irony being that many of those very men were defiantly against the idea of combining God and government.) There is a small, but loud and proud, group of people who are trying to split the country like the Red Sea, with Christian believers on one side and all others, known as “enemies”, on the other side. They say America needs to be brought back to its non-existent roots as a Christian-only nation. O’Donnell goes even as far as to say the idea of “separation of church and state” came from Hitler first (is there anything that guy can’t be connected to?)

Barbara Streisand said it best in the title to her Huffington Post piece: Stop. Think. Breathe. (You should truly take a peek.)In my own words, I would warn that if we are not careful as a country about where we let this flood of anger and fundamentalism takes us, we will find the country wiped clean, not of our sins, but of our freedoms.

The Assault on Reason: Attacks from the Head and Gut

Since I’m not President, I finally have time to finish writing my book.

Rating: 7 out of 10

Flipping through these pages can be tragic when you read the level of intelligence behind the words and begin to wonder what the world would be like today if Al Gore had served George W. Bush’s two terms in office. Would there be milk chocolate fairies delivering candy and fountain-style root beer floats to children throughout the heartland of America? No, absolutely not. Yet I would wage a healthy amount of money that the U.S.A. would not have been in the geopolitical crapper as it was when George W. Bush finally walked out of those hallowed doors with one of the lowest approval ratings in history. His one-time opponent, Al Gore, tries to explain and extol on the reasons things went so badly off the rails.

The Assault on Reason is written by former Vice President Al Gore and details chapter after chapter the numerous areas where the Bush years, and some of those before, have displayed an incredible and frightening trend replacing science and reason with faith and narrow-mindedness. The government we once knew, the one begun all those years back, has been systematically dismantled, pulling the power from the people as a whole and concentrating it into an increasingly small number of hands. Those chosen few have since done everything in their power to eliminate reason and intellectual debate in favor of religious rhetoric and cowboy posturing in face of any and all opposing evidence. In essence, readers feel the true power of the American people slip further and further away with each turn of the page.

Before even opening the book, it must be noted the context in which these words live. Al Gore lost the Presidential election back in 2000 in one of the most contentious, and in some minds demonstrably corrupted, rulings in history. This man was a single breath away from the oval office and seven years later he writes a book about how terrible a job his former opponent is doing. So it is impossible to view this book without a small sense of bias on the part of the author. Yet, although the book does sometimes fall too far into “political slam-book” territory and reaches a slight whiny tone, Gore checks himself and within a few pages brings it back to a place where he backs up each and every criticism with solid, reasonable and irrefutable facts. In those passages when he cites source after source and charts out the trends which we should be so afraid of, that is when Gore is at his most effective.

The real power of the book is not as a weapon against the Bush-era style of politics and power grabbing, but the entire political system hierarchy and its continued growth away from the general public. Gore points out numerous occasions, pre-Bush, that also helped lead to the dangerous place we are today with so much control centralized into the office of President and not spread out amongst the three co-equal branches of the government as intended by those who set it up all those years ago. Yet, Gore even expands on this to the rest of the planet as well when talking about nuclear proliferation, detailing other nations and how they followed the missteps of the American powerhouse. In one of his most eloquent moments in the book, Gore writes:

“As a world community, we must prove that we are wise enough to control what we have been smart enough to create.”

In my mind, that is the central thesis to his entire argument. His textual intent is to warn us of the danger of nuclear arms being in the hands of people who block out reason in favor of belief, religious or otherwise, but sub-textually I believe the statement also shines lights on the creation of our government. Power should never be wielded only by one man alone; that is the antithesis of our democratic style of government. The balance between the three branches has been slowly ebbing away and the person sitting in the oval office has been the silent beneficiary of it all. Both sides have played their parts in the dismantling of that balance, but the Republicans took more giant steps on that march towards  an iron-fist government between 2001-2008 than ever before in history.

What we can learn from this book is how to regain that balance, if you can filter out Gore’s “I wouldn’t have done it that way” tone in various portions. Science, reason and factual proof are slowly making their way back into governing politics, but there is a long way to go and more people who live by that credo need to find their way into the hallowed halls of the capital buildings. I’m not suggesting no one of any faith should be in government, just that they no longer turn a blind eye to anything that doesn’t follow in lockstep with that belief. Important choices should only be made after the most rigorous of debate and unfortunately, as you will see in these pages, our last President was not a huge fan of differing points of view. Even though this was written while Bush was still in office, many of the policies and laws enacted during that time are still in effect and Obama has yet to find the spare time to return some of that balance the government so desperately needs. Let’s help remind him.

The End of the Page Recommendation: A well written and well researched book on the state of our government and the dangerous path it is on. Although not exactly a page turner and it gets randomly embroiled in mudslinging and overly scientific terminology, the final result is still impactful and important.